• Comment Policy
  • (Theoretically) Frequently Asked Questions
  • My Recommendations
  • Re: Ideafication
  • RSS
Ideafication

Ideafication

Steve: Futurist, Political Commentator, & Philosopher
Google

Tag Archive: Society


Charity Part Two: Games For The Commoners

Filed Under: Philosophy by Steve — Leave a comment
December 1, 2010

Sometimes you may hear about a celebrity trying to get their fans to buy their stuff that isn’t selling by putting a charity logo on it and saying 5% or so goes to help people not die somewhere. It’s easy to look good when your name and “save a life” are in the same sentence (though, it has to look legit. “Read Steve’s blog, save a life!” – Did that make you feel good? Hint: You are currently reading Steve’s blog!).

I imagine the first celebrity that thought “Wow, I’m in a position to really get some money flowing to a good cause!” did so purely with the intention of doing good. Later it became a cool thing to do, and eventually it got to the point where if you’re not doing it, you’re kind of an ass in the public eye. That’s a shame, really, because the most popular of them are able to give themselves a squeaky clean image, while the less popular ones continue to struggle with public image.

TwitterRecently, a bunch of notable meatbags decided they were going to ditch Twitter until their fans donate one million to charity.

We all generally understand that celebrities make a lot of money. I estimated that the group could come up with that much money in about a month. Now, I don’t make a habit of looking up how much celebrities make, so if the sources I found are unreliable, bear with me. This may come as a shock, but they could actually come up with this money in a pretty short amount of time.

Lady Gaga is one of the highest paid celebrities of 2010. Not only does she have a lot of income, but any fan (or anyone that skims through pop music news, really) knows she has a ton of useless outfits that she uses to propel her image as “that misunderstood pop star”. She could have picked a few sets of clothes and stuck with those, and gave the money she spent on body-wrapping garbage to this charity. Sure, she may have not spent a million on it all (well, at least we can only hope she didn’t), but it could have gone to this charity.

Even with that aside, this is a celebrity game. They know some fans will miss their attempts at being insightful or humorous in less than 140 characters, so they make them have to work for it. The celebrity organizes it, the fans give their money (remember to feel good about it!), and the end result is that the charity gets the money the celebrity intended to give, but the celebrity didn’t give it; they’ll thank the fans (and be sure to say that they couldn’t have been done without them!) and gain more publicity (possibly awards, too) for themselves, which results in (with the every-now-and-then exceptions aside) even more money for them! It’s like they’ve made an investment in themselves using your work and effort.

It isn’t even a well-thought-out gimmick. They could have turned it into a competition; “Come back to Twitter!” versus “Leave forever!”. They could probably triple the potential income for that charity if people could donate to it to get that bunch of clowns to leave for good. Perhaps they already knew the outcome of that, though.

You are literally being told “I can’t spare any money at the moment, but I’m sure you can.” by people with more money than you.

Charity Part One: Ego Devices

Related reading I found:
Lady Gaga is Still a Spoiled Teenager
Another List of Celebrity Incomes

Tags: Celebrities, Charity, Donations, Entertainment, Meatbags, Money, Pop Culture, Social, Social Games, Social Traits, Society, Twitter
Comment

Warning: This May Be Too Extreme For Some Readers

Filed Under: Philosophy, Political by Steve — Leave a comment
May 13, 2010

“Extremist” arguments are often way out there, but unfortunately they are mostly not even judged or considered on matters of merit, and are cast down due to them being too far from what life is like at the moment. Sometimes this means small steps are taken so we slowly reach what was once called extreme, or we take an entirely different path because the other, more extreme option involves too much changing for people to be comfortable with. This isn’t to say extreme ideas are right, only that they must be judged like any other idea.

A Krogan from the Mass Effect game.In a totally imaginary example that I am making up to make my point look valid, a society exists that allows for shooting people whenever they feel like it. This generates a surprisingly very friendly society, because you have to be nice to people or they might shoot you! However, someone thought about it, and has decided this is not a good rule because it supports destroying people that hold ideas outside the normal ideas, which greatly slows the growth of society. Someone is already suggesting to the leaders that protecting the highly educated from being shot on a whim would be a good idea, but our first person comes in and says all killing without a logical cause should be illegal. This “extremist” has his head blown off within seconds.

I suppose the extremist here was just wrong!

A real world example was slavery; back when the American South had a thriving economy thanks to slave labor, passing a law to protect slaves from abuse may have been desirable, but freeing them entirely was so extreme and hard for the South to handle, it ignited a war. The United States would be very different had we just backed down and assumed that this freedom was just too extreme.

Tags: Abraham Lincoln, America, Arguments, Change, Comfort, Extreme, Extremist, Gun, Judgement, Killing, Mass Effect, Politics, Protection, Rights, Slavery, Society, Wrong
Comment

The Future: A Robotic Economy

Filed Under: Future by Steve — Leave a comment
April 24, 2010

You’ve probably seen it happening if you’ve watched any kind of show on the advancements of industry. Robots are taking over the w- no. Robots are taking our repetitive jobs. The first reaction to that is probably along the lines of “Yeah, that’s great! Nobody wants those jobs anyway.”, which is probably true. However, jobs aren’t either repetitive or not; they are available in various levels of repetition.

The assembly line is the stereotypical job that involves doing the same thing all day. A company makes a product, and every copy of it needs to be the same. This makes for awful work for people, but easy work for machines. This kind of job was the obvious choice for robotics early on, because it didn’t take much to design something to do that job, by today’s standards at least. Something along the lines of “Grab, insert part, screw in, place on conveyor belt.” wouldn’t require any thinking on the robot’s part.

Other jobs are just repetitive in more various ways. Serving fast food is quite repetitive, but the customer wants a number of various things, and it requires a little bit of thinking to make sure the order is right. In order for a robot to do this, it would need a computer that would accept variables, and adjust its functions to that. “Input purchase. Did customer pay? Yes (see order). Did customer order anything custom? No (gather items). Give to customer. Play have-a-nice-day.wav” would be something a fast food robot would do (that’s the simplified version, anyway).

Eventually there would come a time in the future where every job will be able to be done by a robot more effectively than a human, even repairing robots! At this point, your social status would be determined by how many robots you posses. It would be an economy based entirely on “You need money to make money”. However, due to how advanced the state of society would be, living in poverty wouldn’t actually be that bad… At least by today’s standards.

Tags: Awful, Economy, Fast Food, Future, Job, Money, Ownership, Predictions, Repetitive, Robotics, Robots, Simplified, Society, Work
Comment
  • Tags

    2010 Abraham Lincoln Ads America Blog Capitalism Change Comedy Comments Discrimination Economy Electronic Emotions EP Facebook FPFM Future Futures Passed Government Internet Life Mind Virus Money Music My Music News Personal Philosophy Politics Predictions Psychology Questions Racism Religion School Science Social Social Commentary Socialism Social Networking Social Traits Society Technology Video YouTube
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • Find This Blog On…

    Follow this blog
  • Categories

  • Personal

    FormSpring Google+ Last.FM My Music Twitter
  • FP Network

    • Futures Passed Forum
    • Futures Passed Free Music (Label)
    • Futures Passed Music News & Reviews
    • Time For More Info
  • Designed by Stephen Brand at Tech Secure 411, a Computer Repair, Web Design, & Business Technology company.