For some reason, people calling conservatives hypocrites for using entitlement programs (things that they generally are opposed to) has been on the rise, according to my Facebook feed.
Now, as far as I’m aware, these programs exist for the benefit of all people. So, there is no rule against morally supporting it to use it. Turning down any particular group of people would be against the general liberal philosophy as I understand it. I don’t like most Republicans all that much myself but really, they are people too, more or less.
The main argument: In the cases of both thieves and tax agencies, you lose part of what you have worked for against your will. If both of these people/organizations were to offer to give some of it back, I don’t know many people that wouldn’t take it. If you get part of your money back from the thief, no one accuses you of being in support of thievery. If you get it back from the government (in the form of whatever they give it in), however, it somehow implies you support the process.
I know I’ve neglected the ease-of-follow (or whatever you call it) aspect of my writing here, so I’ve set up two new ways to do so through Facebook. I came across a Facebook application called “Networked Blogs”, so I signed up and linked this blog to it. 
The Grand Philosophies of Facebook Users
Among Facebook’s several design flaws are a number of things that can be avoided if you take the right steps. What I’ve noticed that you can’t avoid are the little angsty preppy teen quotes everyone copy/pastes into their wall. Some of it has been made into business by turning them into things you can like on a “like site” with ads and such on it. Still, these little quotes can still plague your feeds.
Occasionally, emotions will overrun someone’s mind, and force them to post things like “men are awful” against their will. It can be happy emotions, too, like “I have the best girlfriend/boyfriend”. In any given moment, at least 90% of the population that is in a relationship would say they’re in the best one (or at least perfect!). If you ask that same group three years later, unless they were in the same relationship, they would definitely say it wasn’t the best.
Sometimes, they’ll even go as far as condescending to those who don’t happen to have learned from the faults they had in the past. Here’s a quote I saw earlier today:
“(Name) Doesnt care about “girls like bad boys” stereotype. I am dating a nice guy, assholes are overrated and I refuse to date them. Keep your dangerous rebels, emo boys, guys who are more jaded then a hobo living under a bridge hooked on meth, guys who like to seem distant so that the girls will chase them(nice reverse psychology). Ive got a good guy and Im not another statistic.”
Sure, that’s nice. While on the outside this is just another “I’m glad I’m not single at the moment”, it’s only slightly more than that. This person may also want to legitimately help someone else be as happy as she as, but in doing so, she has only formed a statement that fits that claim of a “Perfect relationship” status. Other people will tend to cheer these posts on, with even less insight:
“Amen girl! The good guys are the ones who will still cherish you when you’re old and wrinkly.” & “Scream it sister! Amen“. This will happen regardless of the positive/negative qualities of the post they care commenting on.
I’ve seen this sort of thing hundreds of times. It’s generally an early relationship thing, where one is just happy to be with someone, and the arguments haven’t started yet. This happiness from just being with someone is what prevents relationship-straining topics like “What is your opinion on abortion?” from coming up early on. There’s a point in the beginning of a relationship where you’d prefer to be floating in your brain’s happy chemicals than know if the relationship is genuinely going to last. But I’ve arrived at a tangent at this point.
There are also some religion propaganda to help deepen your level of indoctrination, but that’s another topic for another day.
I could just be overthinking this, though. Maybe Facebook is just somewhere thinking doesn’t belong. I went there to connect to people, and I got way more than I wanted. I guess the general public is whatever the popular social site at the time makes it, which would mean Facebook is to blame for enabling these people to feel good about their existence without actually doing anything of value. It’s no place for my social commentary, art, inventions, psychology, or philosophy. That’s quite a shame, really, since these things (not mine in particular, but everyone who provides such things) bring legitimate lasting pleasure to people in the big picture. After all, it’s nerdy stuff (computers, smart phones, and other tech you’re spoiled with at this point that only nerds had three years ago) that you’re using to read this and post stuff on Facebook.
Related Blog Post by Bob Waack.
Minor note: While I’m aware I may upset people with this post, the intention is to educate, not anger.