• Comment Policy
  • (Theoretically) Frequently Asked Questions
  • My Recommendations
  • Re: Ideafication
  • RSS
Ideafication

Ideafication

Steve: Futurist, Political Commentator, & Philosopher
Google

Tag Archive: Abraham Lincoln


Happiness

Filed Under: Personal, Philosophy, Psychology by Steve — 1 Comment
November 10, 2010

I’ve written a lot of things here that could come off as negative, or could make someone come to a realization that makes them disappointed in some way. I’ve periodically been asked if I’m ever happy (Usually by people that disagree with everything I say, but I digress). Someone smarter asked me if being happy is even rational. Until that question, I had no intention of writing something like this but now, clearly, I am.

The question was pretty simple, but when I began to think about it, I began thinking “Wow, no. Being happy isn’t the most rational thing one could be.” but that didn’t seem right at all. That made me unhappy!

Abraham Lincoln, Reasonable Man

Abraham Lincoln was a reasonable man, but you don't see him grinnin' like an idiot!

Some of you may be wondering at this point “Why did you think being happy wasn’t rational?”. To begin, you must realize being happy is a chemical state of mind. The only difference between pain, happiness, and drug induced feelings are amounts and types of chemicals. Sure, a drug that causes absurd levels of “happy” may be seen as over-doing it, but what if you took just enough of it to equal the level of say, eating a delicious cake or seeing someone you care about for the first time in months, it becomes an equal thing, though with the drug you don’t require complicated things or relationships.

Another problem is that there are many instances where one person’s happiness imposes on another’s, likely causing social harm of some sort. The rare but obvious example would be someone that takes pleasure in killing, though there are more common examples like bullies and con artists.

In order to come to any kind of decision on this that was rational, I had to first separate the two concepts into “Socially Negative Happiness” and “Socially Positive Happiness”. I realized there was one other, however, “Socially Neutral Happiness”, under which the likes of drugs would often (but not always) fall. Socially Positive Happiness is, as the name implies, the good kind. The problem here was that I had separated the different types and found “the most rational” one, but how rational was it? Technically, you were still giving into desires, and you might not even be aware of how rational of a choice it was until after the event!

Happiness isn’t intended to fit in the category of “rational”, but it isn’t “irrational” either. It’s the reward for making rationally pleasing decisions. The implications of this are important, though. You can lead a fantastic life by developing a great personal philosophy. Sure, you could be happy without one, but you run the risk of doing harm to others and likely even to yourself down the road. If you’re doing something you find fun but something seems not right, give it some thought! Sure, you may come to the conclusion that it’s not Socially Positive Happiness, but there are countless other things you could be doing that qualify as such. Get out there and do them!

Tags: Abraham Lincoln, Drugs, Happiness, Irrational, Philosophy, Psychology, Reason, Reasoning, Social, Socially Negative Happiness, Socially Neutral Happiness, Socially Positive Happiness
Comment

Warning: This May Be Too Extreme For Some Readers

Filed Under: Philosophy, Political by Steve — Leave a comment
May 13, 2010

“Extremist” arguments are often way out there, but unfortunately they are mostly not even judged or considered on matters of merit, and are cast down due to them being too far from what life is like at the moment. Sometimes this means small steps are taken so we slowly reach what was once called extreme, or we take an entirely different path because the other, more extreme option involves too much changing for people to be comfortable with. This isn’t to say extreme ideas are right, only that they must be judged like any other idea.

A Krogan from the Mass Effect game.In a totally imaginary example that I am making up to make my point look valid, a society exists that allows for shooting people whenever they feel like it. This generates a surprisingly very friendly society, because you have to be nice to people or they might shoot you! However, someone thought about it, and has decided this is not a good rule because it supports destroying people that hold ideas outside the normal ideas, which greatly slows the growth of society. Someone is already suggesting to the leaders that protecting the highly educated from being shot on a whim would be a good idea, but our first person comes in and says all killing without a logical cause should be illegal. This “extremist” has his head blown off within seconds.

I suppose the extremist here was just wrong!

A real world example was slavery; back when the American South had a thriving economy thanks to slave labor, passing a law to protect slaves from abuse may have been desirable, but freeing them entirely was so extreme and hard for the South to handle, it ignited a war. The United States would be very different had we just backed down and assumed that this freedom was just too extreme.

Tags: Abraham Lincoln, America, Arguments, Change, Comfort, Extreme, Extremist, Gun, Judgement, Killing, Mass Effect, Politics, Protection, Rights, Slavery, Society, Wrong
Comment

The Credibility of Wikipedia

Filed Under: Internet, Philosophy by Steve — 1 Comment
April 28, 2010

I can understand why my teachers aren’t happy with Wikipedia being quoted as a source, but it eventually brought up the question: If the individual can edit a Wikipedia page and it’s not acceptable, why is it that an individual that wrote a book is more credible?

WikipediaThe first thing that comes to mind is the numbers of people that can edit Wikipedia and the number that can write a book. Anyone can write a book, but getting it published is just a matter of knowing the right people or having enough money, neither of which is a quality that defines a credible person.

Another thing that would be brought up is the number of people that go into making/publishing a book serve as a safeguard of sorts against false claims and the like. This could also be contested because there is always the chance that they could select a group of people to do this that also believe in things (see: religious books, political publications, product advertisements, etc.) and will allow them to go through.

Abraham LincolnThe main thing you really need to watch out for is blatant edits of falsehood. If you read on Wikipedia that Abraham Lincoln owned a Harley, you’d be able to assume this isn’t true simply by looking up when he lived, which is before the motorcycle was invented. You’d have to assume that the majority of what you check is correct, though. For instance, on a topic such as abortion, there is likely to be “scientific evidence” supporting both sides of the argument; this evidence could have been rounded in favor of the scientist’s personal preference. The average person doesn’t get the opportunity to study a fetus or talk to Abraham Lincoln about the biker gang he rolled with, so it’s hard for them to check facts.

As far as a source goes, however, when Wikipedia is used correctly, it is merely a reaffirmation of the sources it used, just as those sources are an updated version of what they were referencing. If you were truly submitting an assignment based on what actually happened/happens, the goal would be to discover the source of the information and channel it through your work in the best possible way. Would anything that wasn’t source-direct even matter in any way other than being a route to the original information?

Tags: Abortion, Abraham Lincoln, Ads, Book, Credibility, Edit, Evidence, Facts, Information, Known, Motorcycle, People, Philosophy, Politics, Religion, School, Science, Scientific, Source, Truth, Unknown, Wiki, Wikipedia
Comment
  • Tags

    2010 Abraham Lincoln Ads America Blog Capitalism Change Comedy Comments Discrimination Economy Electronic Emotions EP Facebook FPFM Future Futures Passed Government Internet Life Mind Virus Money Music My Music News Personal Philosophy Politics Predictions Psychology Questions Racism Religion School Science Social Social Commentary Socialism Social Networking Social Traits Society Technology Video YouTube
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • Find This Blog On…

    Follow this blog
  • Categories

  • Personal

    FormSpring Google+ Last.FM My Music Twitter
  • FP Network

    • Futures Passed Forum
    • Futures Passed Free Music (Label)
    • Futures Passed Music News & Reviews
    • Time For More Info
  • Designed by Stephen Brand at Tech Secure 411, a Computer Repair, Web Design, & Business Technology company.