Moderator: Lab Technicians

strong414bad wrote:Windows Movie Maker, definitely. It has a real asthetic that I love- you can always tell when a video was made in WMM.

the_Furry_master wrote:strong414bad wrote:Windows Movie Maker, definitely. It has a real asthetic that I love- you can always tell when a video was made in WMM.
That editor sucks.

the_Furry_master wrote:strong414bad wrote:Windows Movie Maker, definitely. It has a real asthetic that I love- you can always tell when a video was made in WMM.
That editor sucks.




Chimæra wrote:All the editors suck, and wmm is the most buggiest, we know there are a lot of good wmm poopers, but that doesn't mean their editor doesn't suck. In comparison to other editors that are just as bad as wmm, the others are more user friendly. I'd favor adobe only because I'm too lazy to get vegas or anything else. I'm just sticking with this buggy shit.



This. Vegas 5 doesn't exactly run perfectly on my computer, but I love the myriad of things you can do with it.lolmushrooms wrote:I'll have to say Vegas, the only other video editor I've tried out was WMM, and it was way too limited and buggy for me.

Return to Computers & Electronics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest